Back to all articles
Corporate Strategy & Portfolio21 MAY 2026·Akos Petri, MSc·4 min read

Why Heineken, Conagra and Hershey Are All Replacing CEOs at Once

Roughly a third of the world's 50 largest consumer companies changed chief executive in 2025, and 2026 is accelerating — Heineken, Conagra and Hershey all lose their CEOs within weeks of each other. The departures look unconnected, but the boards behind them are firing for the same structural reason: the end of pricing-power growth.

Why Heineken, Conagra and Hershey Are All Replacing CEOs at Once
China Private-Label Water Opportunity 2026 — Executive Intelligence Report cover
Paid · ExclusiveZenith Executive Intelligence Report

China Private-Label Water Opportunity 2026

China's next water winners will control channels, not just brands. Private label, channel control and the margin reset — the executive intelligence read for operators, investors and CPG strategy teams sizing the China opportunity.

Access the report

The most dangerous job in consumer goods right now is not running a fragile startup. It is running one of the world's largest food and drink companies. Among the 50 biggest consumer-product firms, roughly 15 changed chief executive during 2025 — about 30%, well above the wider market — and that churn has made consumer goods the shortest-tenure sector for CEOs in recent years. Boards that once handed chief executives the better part of a decade to deliver are now measuring them in quarters.

The next thirty days make the point in person. Heineken's Dolf van den Brink steps down on 31 May after about six years in the top job and 28 at the company; Conagra's Sean Connolly leaves the same day after a decade in which the share price fell sharply; Hershey's Michele Buck retires on 30 June after nearly nine years. Three of the most recognisable names in food and beverage will change hands inside a single month — and the timing is not a coincidence.

What the boards actually want

The common thread is not scandal. It is the end of the pricing-power era. Through the inflation of 2021 to 2023, Big Food could raise prices and book the result as growth; volumes were flat or falling, but revenue still climbed. That trick has run out. Shoppers have traded down to private label, GLP-1 weight-loss drugs are reshaping appetite and basket size, and health and regulatory pressure is squeezing core categories from confectionery to soft drinks. The reckoning is really a referendum on one question: can this company still grow when it can no longer raise prices? Most incumbent CEOs built their careers on the opposite skill.

The replacements tell the story

Where boards look for successors is the real signal. Around a third of new consumer-goods chief executives last year were hired from outside the company, many with explicit turnaround records. Some boards have gone further and reinstalled former leaders who ran the business in its growth years — Jim Koch back at Boston Beer, Joe Scalzo at Simply Good Foods, Jeffrey Ettinger at Hormel. Nestlé's reset under Philipp Navratil, with 16,000 jobs cut and its ice cream and water arms carved out, is the template others are now being hired to copy. Boards are no longer recruiting brand stewards; they are recruiting operators with a mandate to cut, refocus and rebuild volume.

This is a strategy signal, not an HR story

Each leadership change is a portfolio decision waiting to happen. A new chief executive arrives with a rare licence to take write-downs, exit categories and announce the deals a predecessor spent years avoiding — all of it framed as cleaning up an inheritance. Every new Big Food CEO is a divestiture, an acquisition or a restructuring that has not been announced yet. The incoming Heineken boss inherits a beer slump alongside a fast-growing no-alcohol business that needs capital; Hershey's successor inherits a cocoa-cost crisis; Conagra's John Brase inherits a portfolio under private-label siege. For M&A advisers and private equity, the leadership map has quietly become a deal pipeline.

Looking ahead

None of this reverses in 2026. With consumer goods the shortest-tenure sector and boards now rewarding decisiveness over patience, expect more exits, more outsider hires, and more portfolios reshaped inside a new chief executive's first hundred days. The companies that can prove they grow on volume rather than price will keep their leaders and their valuations; the ones that cannot will keep changing both. For operators, investors and buyers, the smartest move is to read the org chart as a strategy document — because the next wave of asset sales and acquisitions will be signed by chief executives who do not yet have their feet under the desk.

Share it with your peers

Pass this analysis to colleagues who track the food and beverage market.

Limited senior advisory capacity now open.

Zenith Consulting is opening limited senior advisory capacity for selected food and beverage companies planning growth, market entry or performance improvement projects.

Apply for a senior project review
Preview of the Zenith Infographs Library — 50+ premium food, beverage and water strategy visuals
Free · 50+ visualsZenith Infographs Library

Explore our infograph library — strategy visuals for food, beverage & water leaders.

M&A deals, category growth, brand ownership, profit pools and more — at a glance. Free access for operators, investors and CPG strategy teams.

Browse the library

Strategic Insights


📊 Analytics & Strategic Insight

The org chart is the new deal pipeline — and most investors are reading it too late

The decision most in this industry are avoiding:

👉 Treating CEO churn as governance noise instead of a leading indicator. Most read a leadership change as instability to wait out. It is actually the earliest and cheapest signal of which portfolios are about to be broken up and which categories are about to be sold.

👉 Assuming the outsider-turnaround hire is automatically bullish. An external CEO with a fix-it record usually means the board has concluded the current strategy cannot be repaired from inside — so the first year is impairments and exits, not a growth re-rating.

👉 Confusing tenure stability with strength. A long-serving chief executive in a low-volume category can be the bigger risk. In 2026, continuity is too often a euphemism for structural decline that no one has been forced to confront.

Here's the full context:

2021–2023: Inflation hands Big Food historic pricing power; revenue grows while volumes stall, masking a deeper growth problem behind strong headline numbers.

2024–2025: Pricing power fades as private label, GLP-1 drugs and health regulation hit volumes. Around 15 of the 50 largest consumer companies change CEO in 2025 (~30%), making consumer the shortest-tenure sector.

January 2026: Heineken announces Dolf van den Brink will step down on 31 May amid a beer-sales slump; the supervisory board opens a successor search and finds no internal heir ready.

Early 2026: Conagra confirms Sean Connolly's 31 May exit after a decade of share-price decline, with John Brase taking over on 1 June; Hershey sets Michele Buck's retirement for 30 June.

Most recent: Trade analysis in May 2026 frames the wave as a structural pattern, not isolated events — boards openly out of patience, hiring turnaround operators and even reinstalling former chiefs (Koch, Scalzo, Ettinger).

What this means for food and beverage operators and investors:

Map leadership transitions to deal probability. A new outsider CEO inside the first 12 months is one of the strongest non-financial predictors of a divestiture or major restructuring. Turn the transition calendar into a watchlist before the announcements land.

Underwrite the strategy, not the person. When backing, buying or competing with a company mid-transition, assume the incoming chief executive will reset guidance low, take impairments early and reshape the portfolio. Model the reset, not the legacy plan.

Volume is the new scoreboard. Companies that can show organic volume growth without price increases will command a premium; price-dependent growth stories will keep losing both their CEOs and their multiple.

3 moves you can make this week:

1️⃣ Build a CEO-transition watchlist. List the priority food and beverage names with leaders departing or inside their first 18 months, and flag the categories within each that are most exposed to a divestiture.

2️⃣ Run a price-versus-volume diagnostic. Split your own — or a target's — last eight quarters of growth into price-led and volume-led. If price did the heavy lifting, treat it as a live leadership-risk flag, not a win.

3️⃣ Lock terms before the first strategy review. If you sell into or partner with a company mid-transition, agree commercial terms before the new chief executive's opening review — the window for favourable deals narrows the moment the reset is announced.


Take the Next Step

♻️ Looking for a high-growth investment in sustainable beverage technology?
An iF Design Award-winning, IoT-enabled product line solving the single-use plastic crisis from the inside — designed for the home and B2B market. Strong structural tailwinds as plastic regulations tighten across Europe.
→ Request the investor deck: info@zenithglobalcommercial.com

Share these strategic insights

Send the deeper analysis straight to peers who'll act on it.

Sister Publication

Also follow our Water Dispense Market Intelligence

Category analyses, operator briefings, and investor signals across the global water dispense market.

Visit

Get a monthly reminder

Once a month we'll email you to check back for the latest food and beverage intelligence. No spam, just a friendly nudge.